The contrast is dramatized. Neither is right or wrong. Both are needed. As far as design, approach, etc., this must be generalism. This does not mean generalists in control, but generalism should guide decisions about medical education, before it explodes from lack of focus internally and externally.
Generalism, Medical Education, and Family Medicine: Complimentary Not Competitive
Intellectual Subspecialist Technophilic |
Generalist Service-minded Broad prep |
Admissions Emphasis |
|
Emphasis on intellectual intelligence, standardized tests, grades, research experience, understanding of professional culture, research issues specialized and more isolated - disease and procedures and technology
|
Emphasis on emotional intelligence, adaptation, service orientation, volunteer, leader, broader issues, need to understand people and communities, public health, research is integrative - issues access and equity and education |
Environment of med ed, hidden culture tends to be… |
|
Emphasis on details of voyage, books, procedures, disease, technology, limited educational venues, curriculum too packed to allow individuation or volunteerism, often trainees forget why they chose medicine bogged down in all of the details they have to do, passive learning, learners not treated well as low rank
|
Emphasis on voyage itself, Vast and Endless Sea Personal experiences key, relationships, hands on learning by decision making, unlimited educational environments, broad-based learning encouraged, generalists see needs of patients as whole persons and cannot ignore as easily, learners treated as colleagues |
Faculty situation, values, attitude |
|
More likely to have others adapt to them, rarely asked to change their attitudes, duties, etc.
|
Have to adapt to needs of patients, colleagues, environment, community, family, versatility a key characteristic to have or learn |
Internally focused academics and research, Accountable to few
|
Externally focused service and community, Accountable to community, employers, patients |
Challenge of material wealth, distraction
|
Less challenges, although significant all docs |
Patients temporary and fewer in number
|
More continuity and higher volume, more uncertainty |
Graduates major activities |
|
Clinical Specialty, research, increase cost of care through procedures and technology, usually follow a defined pathway |
Broader aspects of relationships, counseling, personal management important, access issues key, decrease cost of health overall by improving access, prevention, discover and pursue a niche or special situation with patients, colleagues |
Major finding - first year of actual decrease in overall cancer mortality was 1995 according to National Cancer Institute, and this was due mainly to declines in male smoking, not technology, research, or new methods of treatment. | |
Student and Residents see |
|
Small carefully crafted part of the life of the faculty member |
See the whole aspect of FP life, practice, personal, family, community, management, hassle factors, not much held back |
Patients are |
|
Less well known, less likely to allow care Mistakes seen by other specialists or coroner |
FPs know their patients and know that students and residents must learn decision making, procedures Mistakes seen by specialists, anecdotal stories unfair |
Clinical problems faced |
|
Usually known entity with one or a few options, closed approach soon needed |
Often unknown or uncertain, comparison with common and uncommon, comparison among different organ systems with similar, comparison with psychosocial dimensions, comparison with experiential knowledge about patient and family, open approach needed, sometimes re-discovery in longer or future visits with additional info |
Generalism, Medical Education, and Family Medicine: Complimentary Not Competitive
Specialist vs Generalist humor
Objectives for Rural Programs and Curricula
Medical Schools and Restoration
Flexner’s Impact on American Medicine